Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾDZ¸Ä¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁöÁö ´ÜÀϼöº¹¿¡¼­ ±Ù½É ĵƿ·¹¹ö°¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÇÕº´Áõ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

COMPLICATIONS OF THE IMPLANT-SUPPORTED POSTERIOR MANDIBULAR SINGLE RESTORATIONS WITH MESIAL CANTILEVER

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 35±Ç 4È£ p.248 ~ 252
½ÅÇý½Â, ±è¸í·¡, ±è¼±Á¾,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
½ÅÇý½Â ( Shin He-Sung ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø ÀÓÇöõÆ®Çаú
±è¸í·¡ ( Kim Myung-Rae ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø ÀÓÇöõÆ®Çаú
±è¼±Á¾ ( Kim Sun-Jong ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø ÀÓÇöõÆ®Çаú

Abstract


Purpose: This retrospective study was performed to analyze the relationship between complications of the posterior mandibular single crowns and distance from the adjacent teeth to the implant.

Subjects and Methods : Of the patients who presented Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital & Yonsei University Dental Hospital with missing of the posterior mandibular molar and restored with implant-supported 18 Single crowns between 1996 thru 2007, 115 patients had been followed after crown delivery. The subjects were divided into complication-followed group and a control without any problems. The distance from the most distal tooth to the implant were measured. The prosthetic & biologic complications were reviewed by the cantilever distance and analyzed by abutment type, age & gender statistically using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Inc., USA).

Results and Conclusion : The results were as follows; 1) The posterior mandibular single crown with cantilever showed higher incidence of follow-up complications upon logistic analysis (p<0.05). 2) The prosthetic and biologic complications are related with the cantilever distance with 2.1 odds ratio and 3.39 cut-off value of specificity & sensitivity by SPSS 12.0. 3) The complications are neither significant in abutment types nor age & gender.

Å°¿öµå

Posterior single implant;mesial cantilever;complication

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed